Single Center Prospective Study of Cross-Clamp versus Balloon Occlusion in Robotic Mitral Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Both transthoracic aortic cross-clamp and endoaortic balloon occlusion have been shown to have comparable safety profiles for aortic occlusion. Since most surgeons use only one technique, we sought to compare the outcomes when a homogeneous group of surgeons changed their occlusion technique from aortic cross-clamp to balloon occlusion. METHODS: We changed our technique from aortic cross-clamp to balloon occlusion in November 2022. This allowed us to conduct a prospective treatment comparison study in the same group of surgeons. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match cases(balloon occlusion) 1:3 to controls (aortic cross-clamp) based on age, gender, body mass index, concomitant maze, and tricuspid valve repair. RESULTS: Total of 411 patients underwent robotic mitral surgery from 2020 through 2023. Using PSM, 56 balloon occlusion patients were matched to 168 aortic cross-clamp patients. Median age was 65 years (interquartile range[IQR],55.6-70.0) and the majority were males(n=119,53%). All valves were successfully repaired. Balloon occlusion had a shorter median cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time compared to aortic cross-clamp (84.0 vs. 94.5 min,p=0.006). Median cross-clamp time (64.0 vs. 64.0 min,p=0.483) and total surgery time (5.9 vs. 6.1 hours,p=0.495) did not differ between groups. There was no in hospital death. There were five surgeons who performed various combinations of console and bedside roles. CPB, cross-clamp, and surgery durations were not significantly affected by the different surgeon combinations. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to aortic cross-clamp, balloon occlusion has similar perioperative and early postoperative outcomes. Additionally, it likely introduces a 10-minute reduction in total CPB time.

Navigating missing link: innovative cannulation for robotic mitral valve repair in the absence of inferior vena cava.

Cardiac surgeries often require the use of cardiopulmonary bypass to allow visualization and manipulation of tissues. Vascular anomalies may impose challenges with access configuration. A patient was evaluated for robot-assisted mitral valve repair and found to have an atretic inferior vena cava secondary due to chronic occlusion. The patient was cannulated arterially through the left common femoral artery, and two cannulation sites were applied for venous drainage: the right intrajugular vein and a second percutaneous access site directly into the right atrium through the chest wall. The procedure was completed without immediate complications, and the patient's perioperative course was unremarkable.

A Case Series of Minimally Invasive Robotic-Assisted Resection of Cardiac Papillary Fibroelastoma: The Mayo Clinic Experience.

Papillary fibroelastomas (PFEs) are small, slowly growing benign cardiac tumors with clinically significant risk of embolization. Surgical excision is the definitive treatment of symptomatic PFE and is conventionally performed through a median sternotomy. In this study, we report a series of 12 patients, who underwent robotic-assisted PFE removal at the Mayo Clinic. PFE involved the mitral valve, left atrium, and tricuspid valve. No major complications occurred after the procedure, and most patients were discharged 4 days after the surgery. On follow-up, 1 patient demonstrated pericarditis.

Does Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Repair Mean Less Postoperative Pain?

BACKGROUND: Rapid recovery after minimally invasive mitral valve (MV) repair has been demonstrated in many studies, but the issue of postoperative pain has not been fully elucidated. We evaluated pain scores and medication use in patients undergoing MV repair by minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open sternotomy (OS). METHODS: Between 2008 and 2019, 1332 patients underwent isolated MV repair by OS, and 913 underwent minimally invasive MV repair. After 1:1 propensity score matching, the study included 709 patients in each group. Opioid use was quantified as oral morphine equivalents in milligrams for each hospital day. The highest pain scores were collected from a visual analogue scale at 6-hour intervals. Predictive modeling was employed to compare pain medications and pain scores between the groups. RESULTS: The postoperative median length of stay was 3 (3-4) and 5 (4-5) days for the MIS and OS groups, respectively (P < .001). The predicted geometric mean oral morphine equivalents demonstrated lower opioid use for the MIS group compared with the OS group for the first 4 days. However, the predicted mean pain score was higher in the first 24 hours for the MIS group compared with the OS group (4.7 [4.5-4.8] vs 4.4 [4.3-4.5], respectively, on a visual analogue scale of 0 to 10). CONCLUSIONS: MV repair by MIS methods was associated with decreased opioid use but not with decreased postoperative pain scores. Possible explanations include the difference in incision site pain and subjective differences in postoperative pain expectations.

Malignant Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction: A Reason to Operate?

A 57-year-old man with high-grade synovial sarcoma was found to have cardiac involvement of his malignancy. Intracardiac tumor resulted in dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and severe mitral regurgitation. He underwent mitral valve replacement and had no cardiovascular symptoms at 1-year follow-up. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Robotic vs. minimally invasive mitral valve repair: A 5-year comparison of surgical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive mitral valve repair (MVr) is commonly performed. Data on the outcomes of robotic MVr versus nonrobotic minimally invasive MVr are lacking. We sought to compare the short-term and mid-term outcomes of robotic and nonrobotic MVr. METHODS: We reviewed all patients who underwent robotic MVr (n = 424) or nonrobotic MVr via right mini-thoracotomy (n = 86) at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, from January 2015 to February 2020. Data on baseline and operative characteristics, operative and long-term outcomes were analyzed. Patients were matched 1:1 using propensity scores. RESULTS: Sixty-nine matched pairs were included in the study. The median age was 59 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 54-69) and 75% (n = 103) were male. Baseline characteristics were similar after matching. Robotic and nonrobotic MVr had similar operative characteristics, except that robotic had longer cross-clamp times (57 [48-67] vs. 47 [37-58] min, p < .001) and more P2 resections (83% vs. 68%, p = .05) compared to nonrobotic MVr. There was no difference in operative outcomes between groups. Hospital stay was shorter after robotic MVr (4 [3-4] vs. 4 [4-6] days, p = .003). After a median follow-up of 3.3 years (IQR, 2.1-4.5), there was no mortality in either group, and there was no difference in freedom from mitral valve reoperations between robotic and nonrobotic MVr (5 years: 97.1% vs. 95.7%, p = .63). Follow-up echocardiogram analysis predicted excellent freedom from recurrent moderate-or-severe mitral regurgitation at 3 years after robotic and nonrobotic MVr (90% vs. 92%, p = .18, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both short-term and mid-term outcomes of robotic and nonrobotic minimally invasive mitral repair surgery are comparable.

Controversy pro: Mechanical AVR for better long-term survival of 50-70 years old.

Selection of the most appropriate type of aortic valve prosthesis (mechanical or biologic) for patients 50-70 years of age is a matter of frequent debate. The purpose of this article is to review overlooked concepts and misconceptions in valve-related complications, prosthesis durability, and late survival to aid decision making in contemporary practice. A trend favoring improved long-term survival was found among patients who receive a mechanical prosthesis compared to a biologic substitute. Additionally, an acceptably low rate of long-term valve-related thromboembolism and hemorrhage was found among those with mechanical prostheses. Implantation of a biologic valve substitute did not appear to reduce the risk of thromboembolism, may not eliminate the need for long-term anticoagulation and may be associated with an increased risk of late mortality. These findings may aid providers (and patients) in the preoperative consultation and seem to support consideration of a mechanical heart valve substitute over a biologic valve for patients 50-70 years age.

Population-Based Trends in Amputations and Revascularizations for Peripheral Artery Disease From 1990 to 2009.

OBJECTIVE: To determine trends in amputations and revascularizations for peripheral artery disease (PAD) in a well-defined population. METHODS: A population-based cohort study of Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents with PAD undergoing amputation or revascularization was conducted between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2009. Population-level 5-year incidence trends for endovascular, open surgical, and hybrid revascularizations and major and minor amputations were determined. Limb-specific outcomes after revascularization, including major adverse limb events and amputation-free survival, were compared between initial surgical and endovascular or hybrid revascularization groups using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: We identified 773 residents who underwent 1906 limb-procedures, including 689 open revascularizations, 685 endovascular or hybrid revascularizations, and 220 major amputations. During the 20-year study period, the incidence of endovascular and hybrid revascularizations increased, whereas the incidence of open surgical revascularizations and major amputations decreased. Incidence of revascularizations for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) did not change. Among residents with CLTI undergoing their first revascularization on a limb, endovascular revascularization was associated with more major adverse limb events and major amputations compared with surgical revascularization during the ensuing 15 years. CONCLUSION: The rising incidence of endovascular and hybrid revascularizations and the decreasing incidence of open surgical revascularizations for PAD were associated with a decreasing incidence of major amputations in this population between 1990 and 2009, despite a stable incidence of revascularizations for CLTI. With more major adverse limb events and major amputations after endovascular revascularization, these trends suggest that additional emphasis should be placed on improving limb salvage efforts beyond just mode of revascularization.

Robotic Mitral Valve Repair: A Decade of Experience With Echocardiographic Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Surgical approaches for mitral valve (MV) disease have evolved with the aim of developing minimally invasive techniques. Although the safety of robotic procedures has been documented, there are limited data on long-term echocardiographic follow-up. This review demonstrates outcomes of 11 years of robotic MV repair at a single, tertiary institution. METHODS: From 2008 to 2019, 843 patients underwent robotic MV repair at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. Repeated measures generalized least squares (GLS) modeling was used to assess the echocardiographic changes over time. RESULTS: The median age was 58 years (interquartile range, 50.8, 65.5 years), and 591 were male (70.1%). The mechanism of mitral regurgitation was posterior leaflet prolapse in 479 (56.8%) patients, bileaflet prolapse in 325 (38.6%), and anterior leaflet prolapse in 36 (4.3%). There were 3 early deaths (0.4%) and 24 early reoperations (2.8%). Echocardiographic follow-up demonstrated left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic dimensions, left atrial volume index, and pulmonary pressure all continuously improved up to 2 years postoperatively. Ejection fraction immediately declined postoperatively but then gradually improved to near normal over 2 years. Survival and freedom from reoperation at 10 years were 93% and 92.6%, respectively. When patients were surveyed after dismissal, 93.4% reported their activity level at or above their peers, and 93.3% reported no activity limitation from cardiac symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic MV repair is safe and effective with excellent long-term results, including echocardiographic data that demonstrated early improvement in cardiac chamber size and maintenance of postoperative cardiac function. Exceedingly low mortality rates and freedom from reoperation are comparable to those of the standard open repair.

Massive intrathoracic solitary fibrous tumor of the right hemithorax.

Solitary fibrous tumors of the pleura (SFTP) are rare mesenchymal tumors that arise from visceral or parietal tissue. Surgical resection of massive SFTP can be complicated by airway collapse, vascular compression/hemodynamic instability, and hemorrhage. Patients with SFTP may also present with metabolic derangements secondary to paraneoplastic processes. We present a case of successful removal of massive right-sided SFTP via clamshell sternotomy and discuss the perioperative considerations for which providers should be familiar.

Impact of Hematologic Malignancies on Outcome of Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest that patients with prior or current hematologic malignancy are at increased risk of intraoperative and postoperative complications when undergoing cardiac surgery. The aim of this review was to compare clinical outcomes of patients with a history of hematologic malignancy to those of similar patients with no known blood dyscrasia. METHODS: From January 1993 to June 2017, 37,839 patients underwent elective cardiac surgery at Mayo Clinic. We matched 612 patients (1.6%) with a history of hematologic malignancy to 612 controls, and compared operative details, early postoperative complications, and late survival. RESULTS: The median age of matched patients with hematologic malignancy was 71 years (interquartile range [IQR], 62 to 77) and 71 years (IQR, 62 to 77) for patients without cancer. Patients with prior diagnosis of malignancy had lower hemoglobin levels, 12.8 (IQR, 11.5 to 13.8) vs 13.5 (IQR, 12.2 to 14.6; P < .001), but similar platelet counts, 195 (IQR, 147 to 263) vs 203 (IQR, 170 to 245; P = .533). Patients with malignancy were at greater risk of receiving postoperative blood transfusions (47.4% vs 35.6%, P < .001). However, reoperations for postoperative bleeding (4.7% vs 3.3%, P = .253) and stroke (1.3% vs 1.3%, P > .999) were similar. Thirty-day mortality was 3.3% among patients with hematologic malignancy and 1.5% among matched controls (P = .061). Overall survival among patients with cancer was reduced (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although late survival is reduced in patients with hematologic malignancies, early outcomes are generally similar to those of matched controls. Therefore, surgery should not be withheld from patients with a diagnosis of hematologic malignancy who would benefit from cardiac procedures.

Open versus thoracoscopic thymectomy for juvenile myasthenia gravis.

BACKGROUND: Juvenile myasthenia gravis (JMG) is an antibody mediated autoimmune disorder that manifests as progressive voluntary muscle weakness and fatigue. In medically refractory cases, thymectomy has been shown to abrogate symptoms and reduce glucocorticoid dependence. While transcervical or transsternal incisions have been the traditional approach, adult trends now favor thoracoscopic thymectomy. Little data exist to support this approach in children. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients younger than 20 years of age who underwent a thymectomy for JMG at two pediatric institutions between 2001 and 2018 was performed. Children were divided into either an open (transcervical or transsternal) or thoracoscopic group and baseline characteristics, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Thirty-four thymectomies were performed during the 18-year study period; 18 via an open and 16 via a thoracoscopic approach. The operative time was shorter for open procedures compared thoracoscopic ones (108 ±â€¯49 and 145 ±â€¯43 min, respectively, p = 0.025). Thoracoscopic thymectomy was associated with less intraoperative blood loss (5.5 ±â€¯6.0 vs 55 ±â€¯67 ml, p = 0.007), decreased duration of postoperative intravenous narcotic use (5.0 ±â€¯1.5 vs 20 ±â€¯23 h, p = 0.018), and a shorter length of hospitalization (1.7 ±â€¯1.0 vs 2.7 ±â€¯1.1 days, p = 0.009). No perioperative complication occurred in either group. Clinical improvement was reported in 94% of children in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracoscopic thymectomy in children is a safe and effective surgical technique for the treatment of JMG. Increased acceptance of this minimally invasive approach by children, families, and referring neurologists may enable earlier surgical intervention. TYPE OF STUDY: Clinical research paper. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Deliberate Practice and the Emerging Roles of Simulation in Thoracic Surgery.

In the current era of duty hour limitations and societal focus on cardiothoracic surgical outcomes, simulation and deliberate practice have emerged as valuable supplemental training options. Evidence supporting acquisition of technical skill, clinical transferability, and patient safety within the realm of simulation is mounting. This article provides a focused synthesis of evidence regarding the usefulness of simulation-based training and deliberate practice as a whole and within the subspecialty of cardiothoracic surgery.

The Need for Multiple Bypass Grafts in Repair of Right Coronary Artery-to-Coronary Sinus Fistulas.

Coronary artery fistulas are rare anomalies with controversial management strategies. The two main treatment options are surgical repair and catheter embolization. This case report describes successful treatment of a complex right coronary artery-to-coronary sinus fistula by using a less conventional approach: multiple coronary artery bypass grafting.

Correlation of Objective Assessment Data With General Surgery Resident In-Training Evaluation Reports and Operative Volumes.

OBJECTIVE: Faculty evaluations, ABSITE scores, and operative case volumes often tell little about true resident performance. We developed an objective structured clinical examination called the Surgical X-Games (5 rooms, 15 minutes each, 12-15 tests total, different for each postgraduate [PGY] level). We hypothesized that performance in X-Games will prove more useful in identifying areas of strength or weakness among general surgery (GS) residents than faculty evaluations, ABSITE scores, or operative cases volumes. DESIGN: PGY 2 to 5 GS residents (n = 35) were tested in a semiannual X-Games assessment using multiple simulation tasks: laparoscopic skills, bowel anastomosis, CT/CXR analysis, chest tube placement, etc. over 1 academic year. Resident scores were compared to their ABSITE, in-training evaluation reports, and operating room case numbers. SETTING: Academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: PGY-2, 3, 4, and 5 GS residents at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. RESULTS: Results varied greatly within each class except for staff evaluations: in-training evaluation reports medians for PGY-2s were 5.3 (range: 5.0-6.0), PGY-3s 5.9 (5.5-6.3), PGY-4s 5.6 (5.0-6.0), and PGY-5s were 6.1 (5.6-6.9). Although ABSITE and operating room case volumes fluctated greatly with each PGY class, only X-Games scores (median: PGY-2 = 82, PGY-3 = 61, PGY-4 = 76, and PGY-5 = 60) correlated positively (p < 0.05) with operative case volume and negatively (p < 0.05) with staff evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: X-Games assessment generated wide differentiation of resident performance quickly, inexpensively, and objectively. Although "Minnesota-nice" surgical staff may feel all GS trainees are "above average," objective assessment tells us otherwise.